<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Flex and Rails talking nicely with AMF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilmiddleton.com/2008/06/02/getting-flex-and-rails-talking-nicely-with-amf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2008/06/02/getting-flex-and-rails-talking-nicely-with-amf/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Gibbons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Получаване на Flex и Ограда говори добре с AMF</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2008/06/02/getting-flex-and-rails-talking-nicely-with-amf/#comment-80913</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Gibbons &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Получаване на Flex и Ограда говори добре с AMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilmiddleton.com/?p=236#comment-80913</guid>
		<description>[...] и това е хубав много нея. Сега можете да направите това, което искате с Flex и Ограда. Оригинална статия от Neil Middleton. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] и това е хубав много нея. Сега можете да направите това, което искате с Flex и Ограда. Оригинална статия от Neil Middleton. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2008/06/02/getting-flex-and-rails-talking-nicely-with-amf/#comment-80912</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilmiddleton.com/?p=236#comment-80912</guid>
		<description>@Daniel Certainly appears that way, WebORB hasn't received any commits for a good six months or so, whereas I am aware that RubyAMF is under a lot more active development (RubyAMF v1.6 only came out a couple of weeks back).

I hope to cover a RubyAMF walkthrough sometime soon to back this article up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel Certainly appears that way, WebORB hasn&#8217;t received any commits for a good six months or so, whereas I am aware that RubyAMF is under a lot more active development (RubyAMF v1.6 only came out a couple of weeks back).</p>
<p>I hope to cover a RubyAMF walkthrough sometime soon to back this article up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2008/06/02/getting-flex-and-rails-talking-nicely-with-amf/#comment-80911</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilmiddleton.com/?p=236#comment-80911</guid>
		<description>I understood that WebORB was a stagnant project at the moment, and that RubyAMF was the preferred AMF choice for Ruby/Rails apps. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understood that WebORB was a stagnant project at the moment, and that RubyAMF was the preferred AMF choice for Ruby/Rails apps. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
