<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Flex ever run on .NET?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: barry.b</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-9036</link>
		<dc:creator>barry.b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 10:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.feed-squirrel.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-9036</guid>
		<description>as it turns out (and the secret is no longer a secret), the Coldfusion Scorpio (CF8) team have been working on CF calling .NET assemblies as easy as it does Java.

so if you're after doing Flash Remoting a possible alternative is to use ColdFusion's built-in remoting capabilities that calls into your .NET code. no idea what performance would be like compared t0 natively calling .NET classes - have to wait until the new version ships before making any assumptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as it turns out (and the secret is no longer a secret), the Coldfusion Scorpio (CF8) team have been working on CF calling .NET assemblies as easy as it does Java.</p>
<p>so if you&#8217;re after doing Flash Remoting a possible alternative is to use ColdFusion&#8217;s built-in remoting capabilities that calls into your .NET code. no idea what performance would be like compared t0 natively calling .NET classes - have to wait until the new version ships before making any assumptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Flex and .NET - What&#8217;s the Problem?</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Stewart - Rich Internet Application Mountaineer &#187; Flex and .NET - What&#8217;s the Problem?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.feed-squirrel.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>[...] Neil posted a question on his blog about the roadmap for Flex and .NET. The official answer of course, is that you can invoke .NET web services using Flex and as a result, Flex &#8220;works&#8221; with .NET. But Flash remoting and Flex Data Services functionality is missing, though WebORB provides those features. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neil posted a question on his blog about the roadmap for Flex and .NET. The official answer of course, is that you can invoke .NET web services using Flex and as a result, Flex &#8220;works&#8221; with .NET. But Flash remoting and Flex Data Services functionality is missing, though WebORB provides those features. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Piller</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Piller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.feed-squirrel.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>I would not call it a replacement, since FDS does not run on .NET. It is an implementation of the functionality you find in FDS, but on the .NET side. So far the product fully implements Remoting and Messaging(clients can use RemoteObject and Producer/Consumer MXML/API); there's a partial implementation of DataManagement as well. We're working on adding our own DataManagement implementation for .net (somewhat different than the FDMS approach). The new data management is based on the ideas borrowed from Rails' ActiveRecord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not call it a replacement, since FDS does not run on .NET. It is an implementation of the functionality you find in FDS, but on the .NET side. So far the product fully implements Remoting and Messaging(clients can use RemoteObject and Producer/Consumer MXML/API); there&#8217;s a partial implementation of DataManagement as well. We&#8217;re working on adding our own DataManagement implementation for .net (somewhat different than the FDMS approach). The new data management is based on the ideas borrowed from Rails&#8217; ActiveRecord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.feed-squirrel.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Is this a direct replacement for FDS?  Is there full support for everything FDS does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a direct replacement for FDS?  Is there full support for everything FDS does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Piller</title>
		<link>http://neilmiddleton.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Piller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.feed-squirrel.com/2007/02/26/will-flex-ever-run-on-net/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Flex already runs on .NET. Take a look, you get full blown Remoting, Data Management and Messaging:
http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/dotnet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flex already runs on .NET. Take a look, you get full blown Remoting, Data Management and Messaging:<br />
<a href="http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/dotnet/" rel="nofollow">http://www.themidnightcoders.com/weborb/dotnet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
